CLICCS seeks the answers to questions on plausible climate futures in a range of areas: for example, a CLICCS study was the first to show that, in all areas adjacent to the Arctic Ocean, dramatic land loss is probable, as a result of thawing permafrost. Another proved for the first time that the huge warm water “blob” in the Pacific is not a sporadic phenomenon, as previously assumed; rather, it has been there consistently for the past few decades and is clearly the product of anthropogenic emissions. The bubble is conducive to extreme heat waves in the Northeast Pacific.

CLICCS was also the first institute to model the global carbon cycle including the influence of the coasts, with the climate model ICON-Coast. The model can be applied to determine e.g. how much more anthropogenic CO₂ the coasts will be able to absorb in the future. Pursuing a transdisciplinary approach, the researchers successfully raised awareness of and acceptance for future climate-protection measures drawing on nature-based solutions – a promising option for implementing the required adaptation.

The Cluster also demonstrated that the majority of Germans would be willing to accept a small meat tax, although they find the goal of improving conditions for livestock more convincing than contributing to climate protection. And: the environmental tax on gasoline and diesel, ratified in 1999, has not only massively reduced CO₂ emissions; it has also saved Germany ca. 80 billion euros in the process. The effectiveness of the tax, which has been 15 cents per liter since 2003, had long been considered questionable. As a CLICCS study shows, the tax is good for the climate and human health alike.

Climate protests are an effective tool for supporting political decisions. A study involving 1,500 German respondents showed that their readiness to take part in a climate protest depends on its expected size: the larger the protest, the more likely they are to stay home. Accordingly, Fridays for Future’s decentralized strategy, which employs smaller, local protests, motivates more people to join in.

In Germany, 77 percent of the populace consider climate change to be a “substantial” or “very substantial” threat; that’s 14 percent more than in 2014. In terms of whether citizens expect to be personally affected or not, recent personal experiences are an important factor. 94 percent of those surveyed claimed they had already seen the impacts of climate change or expected to do so within the next ten years.

It’s primarily individuals and households that are adapting to climate change – as shown in a global assessment of 1,400 studies on climate impact adaptation. There is very little systematic networking of various groups of actors and the global distribution of tasks lacks cohesion. We still lack concepts for making societies, infrastructures and risk management better equipped to face the impacts of climate change. Government and non-government actors rarely collaborate comprehensively. These aspects jeopardize the type of transformation needed, for example the implementation of far-reaching, just and sustainable climate impact adaptation measures.